Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For the First Time Ever, Quantum Communication is Demonstrated in Real-World City Conditions
Futurism.com ^

Posted on 09/02/2017 8:30:41 PM PDT by TBP

In a massive step forward, researchers have sent the first quantum-secured message through the air above a city containing more than one bit of information. This proof-of-concept success means that high-capacity, free-space quantum communication will one day be both a practical and secure process between satellites and Earth—and a worldwide quantum encryption network will also be feasible.

In their demonstration, researchers used 4D quantum encryption to transmit data over a free-space optical network between two buildings. The buildings on the University of Ottawa campus stand 0.3 kilometers apart. The high-dimensional encryption scheme is described as “4D” because it sends more information, as every photon encodes two bits of information. This, in turn, means that each photon carries four possibilities with it: 00, 01, 10, or 11.

High-dimensional quantum encryption is also more secure because it can tolerate more signal-obscuring noise such as noise from failed electronics, turbulent air, malfunctioning detectors, and even interception attempts without rendering the transmission unsecured. “This higher noise threshold means that when 2D quantum encryption fails, you can try to implement 4D because it, in principle, is more secure and more noise resistant,” Ebrahim Karimi said in a news release.

Current algorithms are unlikely to be secure in the future as computers become more powerful. Therefore, researchers are working to master stronger encryption techniques such as light-harnessing quantum key distribution, which uses the quantum states of light particles to encode and send the decryption keys for encoded data.

REAL-WORLD TESTING

Now, the concept of quantum communications like this has been a theoretical concept until recently, because global implementation will demand transmission between Earth and satellites. Scientists have been using horizontal tests through the air over distances because the distortion that signals encounter can mimic what they might go through as they pass through the atmosphere. This successful demonstration proved that successful encryption is possible, despite distortion.

These researchers ported their optical setups from the lab to two different rooftops for the testing and protected them from the elements with wooden boxes. After some trial and error, the team successfully used this intracity link to send secure messages using 4D quantum encryption. The error rate for the messages was 11 percent, well below the 19 percent secure connection threshold. The team also compared 4D and 2D encryption, and they found that they were able to transmit 1.6 times more data per photon after error correction using 4D quantum encryption, in spite of turbulence.

Next, this research team plans to test the technology in a three-link network that spans longer distances, with each link about 5.6 kilometers apart. They will also use adaptive optics technology to compensate for the turbulence. The long-term goal is to link the network to the existing city network, creating “a quantum communication network with multiple links but using more than four dimensions while trying to get around the turbulence,” graduate student and team member Alicia Sit said in the press release.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communications; quantum; technology
Quantum theory points to an intelligent universe, which implies the presence of God.
1 posted on 09/02/2017 8:30:41 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

Bookmark


2 posted on 09/02/2017 8:52:05 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

I’ve been saying the exact same thing for years & nobody wrote an article about it.


3 posted on 09/02/2017 9:09:12 PM PDT by Larry381 (Gramen artificiosum odi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP

It seems to me that this would allow nearly instantaneous communication anywhere in the solar system.


4 posted on 09/02/2017 9:13:53 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

It takes a radio signal anywhere from 4 minutes to 24 minutes to travel from Mars to Earth, depending on the relative positions of the two planets at any given time in their orbits.

And Mars is the closest planet to Earth.


5 posted on 09/02/2017 9:34:54 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

but first you have to transport one there


6 posted on 09/02/2017 9:45:35 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

It’s well established that when two electrons are entangled, no matter how far away they are moved, they “communicate” instantaneously. Change the spin of one, and the spin of the other instantly changes.


7 posted on 09/02/2017 9:58:25 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBP

This is nice but nothing is secure with Hillary around.


8 posted on 09/02/2017 10:03:12 PM PDT by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

This should allow E.T. to phone home much more expediently.


9 posted on 09/02/2017 10:05:49 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
but first you have to transport one there

Yes, that's the catch.

10 posted on 09/02/2017 10:23:45 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Perhaps a completed functioning method fully realized what with probes launched from the past.


11 posted on 09/03/2017 12:45:34 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (There is no difference between liberals/rinos/moslems/lamestream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Send one down a worm hole to another galaxy.


12 posted on 09/03/2017 3:26:00 AM PDT by spokeshave (The Fake Media tried to stop us from going to the White House, I am President and they are not. DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I believe each particle is at two places at the same time, or, alternatively, has a double. Do something to its double kight years away and it will be immediately affected.


13 posted on 09/03/2017 4:14:33 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
It seems to me that this would allow nearly instantaneous communication anywhere in the solar system.

Only if you can control the states on one end, which is apparently not possible.

14 posted on 09/03/2017 6:24:05 AM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Do something to its double kight years away and it will be immediately affected.

I think the only thing you can do is observe it.

15 posted on 09/03/2017 6:25:23 AM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Actually Venus is only half the distance.


16 posted on 09/03/2017 7:53:23 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

but it would allow for immediate communications along the trip


17 posted on 09/03/2017 6:37:38 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Change the spin of one, and the spin of the other instantly changes.

First question: How do we find two electrons that are entangled ?

Second question: If 'spin' is the determiner of entanglement, isn't there a 50/50 chance that any electron selected will match the spin of another ?

Third question: In determining whether electrons are entangled, we have to determine what 'spin' they have. Doing so causes them to change 'spin' (an assumption). How do we know it changes when we don't know what 'spin' it had until we try to determine what 'spin' it has ?

18 posted on 09/04/2017 6:57:36 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
I believe each particle is at two places at the same time, or, alternatively, has a double.

How do we find those two specific particles out of an infinity of particles that exist ? Are they labeled ?

How do we know for sure that only two particles are 'linked' ? Maybe when we change the 'spin' of one particle (which can't be determined for sure but is an assumption because we don't know what it's spin 'was') it changes the spin of HALF the particles in the Universe.

19 posted on 09/04/2017 7:01:53 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson