Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan

The qualification is who she was talking to. You know this. You are being absurd.


160 posted on 09/01/2017 3:22:21 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Tammy8

“The qualification is who she was talking to. You know this. You are being absurd.”

No.

Either one can draw blood from an unconscious person or one can’t.

I say one can. You say one can.

According to this article, she said one can’t.

Are we right, or is the nurse right?


Drawing the blood is a fully separate issue than using it in court.

The nurse is not the unconscious person’s lawyer.

She does not have power of attorney over the “patient”.

She is not an officer of the court.

She has zero authority to act as an officer of the law under such circumstances.

She was not even going to draw the blood, the phlebotomist policeman was going to. She had zero authority to stop him from doing it. He respected her enough to not do it over her unlawful obstruction and acted in a civilized manner in arresting her so that the issue could be resolved in a civilized legal manner.

If it is wrong for the blood to be drawn or used, it is the police blood -drawing officer who is putting himself or herself on the line and is subject to subsequent legal issues, ie whether it is admissible or not, whether the police phlebotomist was right or wrong etc...

It is not a nurse’s responsibility or authority to interfere.

Do you understand this?

Agree or disagree, do you at least understand what I just said?


170 posted on 09/01/2017 3:39:31 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson