[NorthMountain]

Bullshit right back at you. Have you considered all the credible threats to POTUS? You missed one (Hinckley/Reagan), that doesn't support your hypothesis. Have you missed any others? Anyone else arrested while attempting to attack the President? You only have a trend if the trend is visible in the entire data set.

As I said, your work is not complete. You may be right (that Presidential assassination is entirely the province of the left), but you haven't convinced me.

You know, one of the reasons we rip the heck out of the Globull Warmists is their habit of cherry-picking data.

[rlmorel]

Well, I think I would put Hinkley in with the leftists because he is mentally ill, but even if not, 90%+ counts as a strong pattern to me.

[jonascord]

In 1958, a cereal company was selling 1 inch squares of Alaska. A child wanted to have them all gathered in one spot and declared a state. When this didn't happen he wrote a letter, threatening to shoot Eisenhower with his dad's .22. He got a visit from the SS. Was this an active threat?

How many samples are enough? The Glowbull Warming Hockey Stick graph was based on a ring count of one tree. A classic example of false statistics. How many times has a Leftist avoided the SS to the point where he could get within range and crank off a round? These listed are the noted active examples of violent hostile action, not intent, carried though to a conclusion. This required an actual attack to make the list. How many did I miss? (I don't recall any Republicans carrying Obama's bloody head on national TV... Apparently, only Leftist hatred is strong enough.)

How many Republican shots were fired at Obama? For that matter, who did I not include?

I wait, hoping to pee on Clinton's grave. Does that make me a part of the un-calculated sample?