Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RayChuang88

I am referring only to TMSR.

It probably is a long way off, but not because it has to be.

Politics, the public’s apprehension of uranium reactors, and the Pentagon have put the ‘kibash’ on it decades ago because it doesn’t produce weapons-grade plutonium.

In addition, big oil, big natural gas, and coal would all but go out of business if Th energy use was widespread.

The Pentagon and large corporations are significant headwinds to be sure. However, I believe there are a handful of other countries actively pursuing this source of energy, and we risk being left behind.

And the bonus? - we’ll never have to listen to those Al Gore/climate change/Paris Accord nutjobs’ BS again!


18 posted on 08/29/2017 1:59:17 PM PDT by Paulie (America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Paulie
There are many groups / forces who would love to see the end of big oil. It would in effect be a transfer of economic power from Texas, Oklahoma, Dakota ect....to those invested in new power.
57 posted on 08/30/2017 10:57:33 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson