To: GIdget2004
A federal judge dismissed Sarah Palin’s defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on TuesdayThe story omits the judge's name.
2 posted on
08/29/2017 12:15:25 PM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Puppage
That’s because the Hill, a liberal hack site does not want us to know
the Judges name.
9 posted on
08/29/2017 12:19:51 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
To: Puppage
I hope she appeals it. Stretch the suffering out much, much longer. Sarah has suffered unfairly. Now it’s their turn, but this time with good reason. Maybe she should consult the Attorneys that helped Hulk Hogan sue Gawker.
That also took a long time.
To: Puppage
It gives his name, Jed Rakoff, and also says he was appointed by Clinton in 1996.
To: Puppage
This will be reversed on appeal.
To: Puppage
Evidently did get a good draw on a judge.
60 posted on
08/29/2017 3:20:52 PM PDT by
xzins
( Support the Freepathon! Every donation is important.)
To: Puppage
Evidently did get a good draw on a judge.
61 posted on
08/29/2017 3:22:42 PM PDT by
xzins
( Support the Freepathon! Every donation is important.)
To: Puppage
“The story omits the judge’s name.”
I guess they don’t want us knowing its a democrat political hack
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson