Posted on 08/28/2017 7:03:38 AM PDT by TigerClaws
With the Chicago homicide rate going way up, it is only natural for ‘Rat voter fraud to rise - there is a directly proportional causal relationship to the two.
The only people voting in Chicago would be the dead.
If vote fraud can be cleaned up - it’ll make it harder for the Democrats to win on turf they own.
The voting turnout in 2016 was an average of 58% nation-wide. Historically cities have lower turnout than rural/small town America. I view anything over 50% turnout in Chicago as fraud.
I read all the comments so far and no one seems to have picked up on this yet: The list he got was of all who voted, not all who were registered. Big difference.
In other words, the list of those who actually voted was lower than the total votes counted by 14,000. Out of 1.1 million votes, that’s a tabulation error rate of a little over one percent. That’s high enough that there was probably some fraudulent over-counting going on, but it’s not what people are claiming here, i.e., that over 100% of eligible voters cast ballots.
I’d be amazed to find that a lot of those “voters” were legitimate voters, but that’s not the issue being discussed here. It’s tabulation of actual votes cast.
Big deal. Once again, evidence of widespread voter fraud, absolutely nothing is done about it and the establishment of the uniparty, along with their minions in the press, tell us that it doesn’t exist and our new AG... Oh, never mind...
2. Lots of places have turnout as a PERCENTAGE OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS in the 80s to low 90s -- look at rural Wisconsin counties that went heavily for Trump, or well-educated precincts.
3. The real problem is failure to clean voter rolls, so that when registered voters exceed number of possibly eligible persons, there is a lot of "deadwood" that could be used for mischief. Nevertheless, there simply aren't cases of more ballots cast than names on the voter list. Such reports are always errors. [Happy to examine any reports of specific precincts or places alleged to the contrary]
this is why the dems are so eager to put a stop to the investigation into voter fraud. They know it exists, and that it is what helps them win election.
If this is not stopped and fundamentally changed,the President Trump win will only be a mild speed bump to the destruction of the Republic.
Yes, Trump won MI by a few thousand votes, but Stabenow lives to fight him onward!
You are missing a major point: the discrepancies and tabulating errors in voting occurred in a single Illinois city.
The Chicago Board of Elections has been stonewalling. Practically eleven months have elapsed since the November, 2016 general election and the election authority has yet to issue its final report?
Trump won 91 out of 102 Illinois counties. Clinton ran up her totals in eleven counties which have city political machine organizations. While I doubt that an investigation would change the results (Trump did not actively campaign in Illinois and ceded the state), Clinton’s percentage would be reduced.
More importantly, the Democratic Machine may be exposed for fraud which could have impacted some down the ballot races. For example, the Democratic candidate for state treasurer barely defeated his Republican opponent.
I'll bet they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.