Replies

As a former National Guardsman, I think you may have a good point. If a crowd control situation gets beyond the capacity of normal law enforcement, as it becomes riot and civil insurrection, a totally different mind set, tactics and equipment is required to deal with it. Military tactics, ultimately. I believe that it would be more productive to train the state militias (National Guards and State Defense Forces) to deal with riot and insurrection and let the police forces handle law enforcement and (peaceful) civil disturbances. Moreover, when the NG and SDF were then deployed, it would send a message: the gloves are off; this is no longer a matter of mere law and order; this is a life or death matter.

On the other hand, some equipment has both a military and a law enforcement use. Grenade launchers for example; some types of armored vehicles; many forms of personal protective gear.

And the separation of enforcing the law and keeping normal civic order, vs. suppressing riot and civil insurrection, will require that the military receive special training and equipment: some less lethal weapons and ammunitions; special urban warfare/riot control vehicles; personal protection gear (shields, body armor, etc.); street warfare tactics and fighting techniques, including a lot more hand-to-hand combat training both armed and unarmed. And the military personnel will have to learn some law enforcement theory and practice as well: how to recognize when a civil crime is being committed; how to record and preserve evidence; how to make an arrest; how to cooperate with and support local law enforcement, so they, the Guardsmen, don't have to become cops, but can leave that to LEO.

It won't be easy, but it would be better than policemen becoming soldiers.