Do we remove all monuments and writings related to the signers and ratifiers of the constitution?
After all they...
1. Allowed slavery to legally exist.
2. Counted slaves as 3/5 of a person in the census, thus codifying the inferior status of slaves.
So take that Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts Bay, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, and Rhode Island and Providence Plantations ( BTW what was up with Rhode Island having plantation in it’s legal name).
Of course they joined Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia in legalizing slavery in America.
( BTW Georgia under Oglethorpe as founded outlawed slavery in it’s original charter, the only state to do so, It was amended later to allow slavery so large landowners could compete with the South Carolina in rice production)
You gotta love the facts of history.
Regarding your point #2: The counting of the slaves as 3/5 of a person was a strategy by the Northern Abolitionists to reduce the population of the slavery states so slavery states would have fewer members of congress.
As I'm sure you know, members of the House of Representatives are allocated by the population of the states, not the number of voters in a state.
Using that as an example of considering slaves as inferior is inaccurate, since slaves could not vote or influence the election of members of the House of Representatives. If the slave had been fully counted the slavery states would have had more representatives and thus more influence prior to the secession.