Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Utah Binger

“I didn’t find anything like that but it is very well known here in Utah art circles that the imagery and drawing lacks professional training. “

Considering what art circles consider “art” these days,I don’t care what they think.

Norman Rockwell was probably scorned by art circles too.

.


44 posted on 08/24/2017 10:57:40 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Mears

Norman Rockwell was scorned in certain art circles because for one he was not purely an artist, he was a commercial illustrator. He did not do art for art’s sake and that is a major demerit in the eyes of some. But, the real source of the scorn was and is political. He portrayed the simple things of American life in a positive, and positively glowing light. And, they hated him for that.


45 posted on 08/24/2017 11:00:37 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Mears

Elitists in art circles have always talked down the illustrators. Rockwell was no exception except to say that he was the premier artist/illustrator of his time. We cannot compare Rockwell to the untrained who use subjects for their statement and fail to make correct art. And yes the image in question is very poorly executed. That is the point of this discussion, not the subject he attempted to illustrate.

Think art, not subjects.


49 posted on 08/24/2017 11:17:49 AM PDT by Utah Binger (At The Maynard Dixon Home and Studio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson