Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

“Their family owned the grazing rights before any “public land” was established. Should the law just give a thumbs up to negating prior contracts just because the government decides to grab some land and call it Federal property?”

And the “grab” was so that Harry Reid could give the land to the Chinks!


85 posted on 08/22/2017 5:22:05 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387

The “grab” I was speaking of happened about a century ago.


94 posted on 08/22/2017 5:27:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387; TigersEye
“Their family owned the grazing rights before any “public land” was established. Should the law just give a thumbs up to negating prior contracts just because the government decides to grab some land and call it Federal property?”

The western US came to USA as federal land via Mexican American war peace treaty in 1848, the Louisiana Purchase in 1807 IIRC and last the Oregon Territory purchase from the British. It all started as Federal territory and in the case of most the far Western states, the majority of the lands remain Federal. In order, the largest land owners in the west are the Department of the Interior (BLM, USFS) and DOD probably followed by the various Indian tribes. Heck, the Navajo and Hopi lands combined are probably just about as large as New England.

192 posted on 08/22/2017 7:51:23 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson