Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China comes to Pak's defence after Trump's attack
Rediff ^ | Tuesday, August 22, 2017 | K J M Varma, PTI

Posted on 08/22/2017 8:41:21 AM PDT by Jyotishi

China on Tuesday jumped to the defence of its all-weather ally Pakistan in the wake of United States President Donald Trump's stern warning to it over providing safe havens to terrorists, saying that Islamabad is at the frontline of combating terrorism.

Trump, in his first prime-time televised address to announce his Afghanistan and South Asia policy, hit out at Pakistan for providing safe havens to 'agents of chaos' that kill Americans in Afghanistan and warned Islamabad that it has 'much to lose' by harbouring terrorists.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying, while reacting to Trump's comments on Pakistan, said, "Hope the relevant policy decision by US side will be conducive to promoting security, stability of the relevant region."

"(On) President Trump's remarks on Pakistan, I should say that Pakistan is at the frontline of fighting terrorism, has made sacrifices in fighting terrorism, making an important contribution to upholding peace and stability," Hua said, strongly defending Beijing's all-weather friend.

Hua, in response to Trump's scathing criticism of Pakistan's support to terror groups, said, 'I think the international community should truly affirm' the efforts by Pakistan in combating terrorism.

"We are pleased to see US and Pakistan to conduct cooperation in anti-terrorism efforts on the basis of mutual respect and contribute to the global peace and stability," she said.

On Trump indicating deepening ties with India, Hua said China is happy to see the development of normal and friendly relations between the two countries as long as such a relationship does not harm other countries and is conducive to regional development.

"So we are pleased to see sound and normal relations between US and India," she said, hoping that the two sides will play a more constructive role promoting regional peace and development.

Hua skirted a direct answer to a question on whether China's policies like blocking India's membership to the Nuclear Suppliers Group and efforts to get Jaish-e-Mohammed leader Masood Azhar banned by the United Nations had created more space for the US to develop closer ties with India, saying its bilateral ties with India or with the US will not be targeted at a third party.

Hua also criticised India's action to block China's road building in Doklam region where the two sides are involved in a standoff.

India's move at Doklam has a negative impact in the eyes of the Chinese people, she said.

India should match its words with deeds, Hua said while calling for unconditional withdrawal of Indian troops and equipment.

Asked about the impact of Trump's decision to follow a more proactive policy in Afghanistan on China, Hua said, the 'Chinese side will uphold the objective and unbiased principle to promote friendly relations with other countries, based on the merits of the matter itself'.

"We hope that the Trump administration's policy adjustment will be conducive to promoting peace and stability in South Asia," she said.

"China closely follows Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. We think the stable relations between the two countries will also be helpful," Hua said.

Referring to recent trip made by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to Afghanistan and Pakistan amid Kabul's allegations that Islamabad was not cracking down on the Taliban, Hua said Wang's visit was aimed at mediating for better relations between the two countries.

During the visit, Afghanistan and Pakistan sent out goodwill messages to each other, especially in the establishment of crisis management mechanism which China is trying to operationalise, she said.

"We also appreciate and applaud the dialogue between the two countries. During the process, as a friend of these two countries, China will, within its capacity, play a constructive role," she said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; china; doklam; india; islam; muslim; pakistan; taliban; terrorism

1 posted on 08/22/2017 8:41:21 AM PDT by Jyotishi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

As part of the background - The Indian national oil company has been helping Vietnam exploit some of the oil deposits in areas that they are in dispute with China over. Also, the Indian Navy made a “show the flag” run in the South China Sea either earlier this year or last year.


2 posted on 08/22/2017 8:44:04 AM PDT by Pecos (A Constitutional republic shouldnÂ’t need to hold its collective breath in fear of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

I did not see President Trump’s statement as an attack on Pakistan. I see it as a question. Who’s side are you on? The terrorists?


3 posted on 08/22/2017 8:45:12 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

President Trump did not attack Pakistan; he warned Pakistan about supporting and harboring terrorists. The PTI author must be a leftist/communist.


4 posted on 08/22/2017 8:48:55 AM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

Which country harbored Bin Laden lol??


5 posted on 08/22/2017 8:54:30 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

So did DWS pet Pakistani IT scam artist sell US Congressional secrets to China?


6 posted on 08/22/2017 8:56:15 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

Islam-bad is at the forefront of fending off terror attacks it originally sponsored against Afghanistan

The Democrat party allying with islamists is also suffering such Pakistanization with BLM/antifa/CAIR but will blame guns instead


7 posted on 08/22/2017 9:08:40 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

“I did not see President Trump’s statement as an attack on Pakistan. I see it as a question. Who’s side are you on? The terrorists?”

And the corollary: “If you are on the side of the terrorists, don’t expect to see a nickel from us!”


8 posted on 08/22/2017 9:14:33 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

China being China.


9 posted on 08/22/2017 9:29:02 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

The Chicomms can go to hell. We should place a 1000 percent tariff on their goods — and I’m not one who believes in tariffs. (They’re horrible economic policy, but they can be effective foreign policy.) We need to sanction China.


10 posted on 08/22/2017 10:50:02 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

A no brainer. It is very logical, and most likely Pakistan will be happy to have a closer embrace with China.

Was that at all in consideration at the NSC and if so how do they expect to deal with it?


11 posted on 08/22/2017 12:36:39 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson