“Start writing. Spell it out. But be polite about it, and at least towards me — do not tell me what I understand, and what I do not — not unless you take time and trouble single out more precisely just what you think I “do not understand” etc.’
Don’t give me homework assignments.
I have posted many comments explaining why I feel Pope Francis does not believe in Catholic principles and therefore is not a true Catholic or a man of God. I have posted many articles about his evil actions that go against the teachings of the Catholic Church. I have posted many articles and explained why he is an evil infiltrator in the Catholic Church.
You are welcome to read them,.as well as the many comments and other articles by other Freepers.
There are also many articles in various Catholic publications about the destructive influence of Pope Francis and how he is not a true Catholic.
So sorry, too late, I already did.
Not on this thread. I went and looked. But your own personal judgements on the matter - how could those matter unless your were "protesting" and had solid grounds to? Need I remind anyone that such had been forbidden (even under pain of death) in centuries past? Speaking of (cough-cough) 'Catholic' principles..."
You are welcome to read them,.as well as the many comments and other articles by other Freepers.
None of which equate myself not understanding the article linked to at Breitbart (which tells me nothing I was not aware of already) or your own comments, on this thread, which I understood fully enough in context of those things I had only briefly glanced at -- having not needed to read it in detail, since I was already aware of the details. Understand now?
So now you are talking about comments you made on OTHER threads that I allegedly do not understand?
And comments made by others too? Yeah I've seen that kind of thing and understood it too. I can understand what they are saying without having to agree that those appraisals of Bergoglio (that he is not 'Catholic') are actual truth of the matter. GET THAT through your head, and do it right now.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a [Roman] Catholic, born and bred, Jesuit trained, and is now serving as duly elected "pope" of the Roman Catholic Church. Buck up, buttercup, things are tough all over.
It's not like Protestants of past eras did not try to warn you folks -- troubles ahead -- due in some measure to troubles behind -- "papacy" as known & practiced within (and by) the Latin Church is blasphemous deformation and distortion of the spirit of the Church at it's inception in regard to gifts of administration.
Those who would in past eras defend papal systematic (and thus the ways of the Latin Church) defending those ways against most any and all critics (even putting critics to death) made the beds that Bergoglio and those weirdo faggot party-priests next door to the Vatican now sleep in.
Get a clue --but no -- Vanna won't loan you a letter. You'll have to guess, and get it right the first time, or else somebody else gets to take a turn at spinning the wheel.