You missed the whole meaning of the article. You did not understand any of my comments.
I skimmed it until seeing nothing AT ALL "new" --MEGO (my eyes glazed over).
Sum it up a few sentences (like, maybe do some work, instead of shooting from the lip?) and then maybe I'll look into it. Or maybe, I won't. It could depend on the quality of the work.
If that were to be truly so, then you could better explain them. I already went through what you said in your own initial comment, line-by-line.
Just because I do not accept the 'just so' story of Bergoglio being allegedly "not" Roman Catholic, and "not" a legitimate 'pope' (as many around here assert) does not mean that I do not understand what is being alleged.
I can see (better said perhaps, I can "sense") the evil behind the ongoing effort to dissolve the borders of Western Nations who's populaces in times past had at the least some notion (and acceptance of) things of the Lord, as written, in scripture. There we go -- I spelled something out. Right, or wrong, that's more work than you've done in the last week!
Beyond the basics of that, you'll have to do better than just telling me that "I" do not understand, if you desire to keep defending the bullshit such as; 'Pope Francis is not a Catholic', that you just posted.
But Pope Francis, evil you say? Ok --fine. Most men are when it comes right down to it.
More narrowly: Bergoglio often does appear to be on the wrong side of things...in my eyes anyhow, and does appear to pay lip-service to, and lend support to forces that would continue dragging Western Civ down -- including now through unfettered immigration into those nations.
Is there something else, oh wise one, who knows so much -- including knowing what I understand, and what I do not (just because I didn't write you a book telling you EVERYTHING I know)?
Start writing. Spell it out. But be polite about it, and at least towards me -- do not tell me what I understand, and what I do not -- not unless you take time and trouble single out more precisely just what you think I "do not understand" etc.
Yourself having made such a claim with no backing whatsoever (other than vanity of your own imagination) was just so much cheap-stunt, dodgy bullshit piled on top of the last pile.
You are simply not smart enough to "read my mind" when attempting to prove whatever points you think valid -- that you think I somehow missed (because I did not stipulate, even though you did not either --other than what I went through, line-by-line?)
Or just shut up, and do not write and publish on the pages of FR at all, not unless doing so more carefully.