To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
You're trying to find a convoluted way to justify reporting that basically claimed that Susan Rice is the current source of leaks in the white house, that she has access to all this classified information, etc etc etc. This is simply objectively false on every level, no matter how hard you try to spin otherwise.Dude, you're either being delusional or you're setting up a very dishonest straw man fallacy. I have no idea if Susan Rice is "the current source of leaks".
Reiterating what I did say for now the third time,
"Eliminating the Need to Know for Rice, gives Rice the power to determine if and when she wishes to see those classified items. She will not need to demonstrate a need to know to anybody up the security chain (and she can gain access at any point in time). If McMaster wants to leave her clearance in place, it would be better to leave in the Need to Know requirement, that is required by almost everybody else with a security clearance."
But all of that is "pathetically" unimportant to you.
To: FreeReign
But all of that is "pathetically" unimportant to you. But of course it's pathetically unimportant. Because her access is limited to her own work product and is necessary for whenever she is called in front of congress, regardless of how expansive you want us to believe it is.
Repeating the same thing over and over again doesn't make her access expand in my mind.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson