Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

What are you talking about? Two highly placed anonymous un-named sources said so. LOL! If they aren’t naming names or providing sources, then they shouldn’t print it or publish it. Kind of like comeys “notes” from his meeting with Trump. Anyone can write crap down and claim “this is what was said”. Like he wouldn’t lie to save his own sorry ass. A load of crap.


24 posted on 08/18/2017 8:08:45 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rktman

“Like he wouldn’t lie to save his own sorry ass.” Agreed.

That reminds me, at least now we know we what to do when the media starts describing someone as having “the highest standards of ethics,” “impeccably honorable” with “an unimpeachable record” as Comey was described, repeatedly all across the media, beginning in 2015 when the Hillary email thing came out. And what they tried to do with Mueller when he was picked to oversee the fake news about Russia.

We can take it to be the opposite of what’s true of the person.


70 posted on 08/18/2017 8:18:49 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson