1) an illegal protest (riot) was in progress Irrelevant to the crash.
2) individuals from that illegal protest were blocking a street Irrelevant to the crash.
3) individuals were attacking the car After it sped down a block towards them.
4) AFTER the attack on the car, the car THEN impacted the crowd False.
5) the crowd then continued to attack the car Who could blame them?
6) the car, no longer able to go forward, then reversed in an attempt to flee the riot. AKA fleeing the scene of an accident.
Those are the facts as seen in the photo evidence. No they're not.
1) Not irrelevant as it is the first domino, the initial illegal activity. Had there been no illegal protest, there would not have been protesters blocking the road.
2) Not irrelevant as it is the second domino. Had the street been clear, no one would have been there to be hurt.
3) The car was LEGALLY traveling down the one way street. You are ASSUMING that he was speeding and have not presented any proof that he was speeding. The fact remains that the crowd was illegally in the street, he was not.
4) In fact true. Photo evidence of windshield damage prior to impacting the crowd and video evidence of an individual striking the car prior to impact to the crowd.
5) I can blame them because it is called assault with a deadly weapon.
6) Fleeing to avoid bodily injury or possible death is not a crime and is in fact, a mitigation against the charge of fleeing in many states.
You may not think that they are facts, and you are entitled to ignore any evidence you want. However, they are still facts.