Skip to comments.
In a Confrontation Over Doklam, China Will Likely Be the Eventual Loser
Wire ^
| 14/08/2017
| ONKAR MARWAH
Posted on 08/14/2017 10:57:03 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
In a Confrontation Over Doklam, China Will Likely Be the Eventual Loser
BY ONKAR MARWAH ON 14/08/2017
Any hostilities will be short and non-conclusive, and will puncture the image of itself that China has built.
On June 16, it became public information that Indian troops had entered the Doklam region near the Chumbi Valley tri-junction area wedged between Bhutan, India and Tibet/China, and stopped a Chinese Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) construction crew...
/snip
Hereafter, the assumptions encompass both countries:
- Any outbreak of hostilities would be a localised and sharp, short war. Neither side would wish to prolong or enlarge it.
- It would be a largely long-distance-ordnance and short-distance-projectile war by land or air. Troops would be used sparingly, only where skirmishing is unavoidable, and mainly to hold ground. Special Operations Forces could be used by both sides for disruption or quick gains. Armour could be employed by both in the Ladakh area and the Tawang area of Arunachal Pradesh.
- It could be initiated in Doklam and simultaneously in other disputed areas, e.g. Ladakh, Uttarakhand or Arunachal Pradesh.
- Cyber or electronic measures and countermeasures as well as drones (armed and for surveillance) could be used to befuddle the opponent.
- Satellite imagery for monitoring the opponents movements and capability would be available to both sides.
- Airpower could be employed to damage rearward supply lines but used to interdict forward formations only to blunt an unacceptable ground advance of the adversary.
- The navies would be on alert and ready to intervene, but not deployed for warfare unless the hostilities spread in time and space. This is unlikely.
- Pakistan will not intervene on Chinas side.
- No state will intervene on Indias side.
/snip
(Excerpt) Read more at thewire.in ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; doklam; india
To: TigerLikesRooster; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; Avenger; prion; Iris7; ...
2
posted on
08/14/2017 10:57:38 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
3
posted on
08/14/2017 11:03:25 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I think this is over optimistic. India will lose. Both likely to lose. Maybe together knock the their populations down a billion or more people.
4
posted on
08/14/2017 11:07:04 PM PDT
by
Reno89519
(Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
To: Reno89519
I think India can turn it into a stalemate. I don't think that it would escalate into a full-scale war. If it does, it will be costly for both. It will set back Chinese ambition, though. India has an political advantage if the game is for “not losing.”
5
posted on
08/14/2017 11:13:09 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe the Sino-Putinist can explain this imperialism of China...
6
posted on
08/14/2017 11:48:35 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: TigerLikesRooster
If Onkar Marwah is the same Onkar Marwah who works/worked for the Indian Civil Service then his conclusions come as no surprise.
But as long as we stay out of it, then it needn’t bother us. The more issues China has to worry about while NK simmers, not to mention its other imperialist ambitions, seems a bonus to me.
7
posted on
08/15/2017 12:42:58 AM PDT
by
Mr Radical
(In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
To: Mr Radical
This would be a good time for the Uyghurs to get feisty.
8
posted on
08/15/2017 2:55:04 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: TigerLikesRooster
China is seeking to nibble off bits and pieces to eventually be in a position to cut off the narrow neck that connects India to the Northwest Territories and to overrun Bhutan. China considers Bhutan and Sikkim to be part of the Tibet package and thus a legitimate possession of China’s. Cutting off and then overrunning the Northwest Territories is a strategic interest of China’s. China could then with a short push through the Burma-Bangla Desh border attain some Indian Ocean frontage
To: Mr Radical
I suspect China is using the Indian gambit as part of its negotiation with Trump over Norkea.
To: FreedomPoster
This would be a better time for Tibetan separatists to get feisty. Let China contemplate trying to maintain a combat supply line through potentially hostile territory while simultaneously having to suppress the separatists.
To: Little Pig
Them too!
I want the PLA and political leadership to have as many distractions and headaches as possible.
12
posted on
08/15/2017 4:24:49 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Little Pig
Tibetans need inspiration from their past: King Gesar
13
posted on
08/15/2017 5:15:11 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Chuckle, chuckle..................
ALL WARS are just supposed to be ‘short’ and ‘sweet’.
...............just say’in............
14
posted on
08/15/2017 5:22:41 AM PDT
by
Flintlock
(The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left to us.)
To: Flintlock
It is a tough place to wage a war where winter comes early.
15
posted on
08/15/2017 5:37:08 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson