Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China warns North Korea: You’re on your own if you go after the United States
WaPo ^ | Simon Denyer

Posted on 08/11/2017 7:26:49 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

The Global Times also cited reports that the Pentagon has prepared plans for B-1B strategic bombers to make preemptive strikes on North Korea's missile sites, and a strongly worded ultimatum from Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis that North Korea should not consider “actions that would lead to the end of its regime and destruction of its people.”

The paper’s comments also reflect the 1961 Sino-North Korean Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance, which obliges China to intervene if North Korea is subject to unprovoked aggression — but not necessarily if Pyongyang starts a war.

“The key point is in the first half of the sentence; China opposes North Korea testing missiles in the waters around Guam,” said Cheng Xiaohe, a North Korea expert at Renmin University of China in Beijing.

With the situation on the Korea Peninsula sliding dangerously toward the point of no return, Chinese media are starting to declare their positions on any potential war, he said. “Secondly, in a half-official way, China is starting to review and clarify the 1961 treaty.”

China has become deeply frustrated with the regime in Pyongyang, and genuinely wants to see a denuclearized Korean Peninsula. But it has always refused to do anything that might destabilize or topple a regime which has long been both ally and buffer state.

That’s because Beijing does not want to see a unified Korean state allied to the United States right up against its border: indeed, hundreds of thousands of Chinese soldiers died during the 1950-53 Korean War to prevent that happening.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allychina; chinank; nknukes; nkoutofcontrol; trumpasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2017 7:26:49 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
That’s because Beijing does not want to see a unified Korean state allied to the United States right up against its border: indeed, hundreds of thousands of Chinese soldiers died during the 1950-53 Korean War to prevent that happening.

The best way to secure that is to make sure that some type of sane regime takes over power in North Korea.


2 posted on 08/11/2017 7:30:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

We should kill litte Kim and reunite the Koreas. There is no reason for them to be apart. We should absolutely do that but then stand aside along with China. No invasions, no “take overs”, no nothing. Just let them be one again.


3 posted on 08/11/2017 7:32:36 AM PDT by CodeToad (AA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Actually I think, as usual, WasPos has the wrong take. China sad if the US takes any pre-emotive action they will back NK.


4 posted on 08/11/2017 7:32:43 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

China has been using NK to tweak the US my entire lifetime. Now the temper tantrums are getting harder for China to control. China has cut off the natural gas pipeline and is turning Nork ships away but its not working like it used to.


5 posted on 08/11/2017 7:33:45 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

China will not allow a unified Korea.
That’s why they have propped up the Kim regimes.


6 posted on 08/11/2017 7:35:06 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Message to China:

You’re COMPLETELY responsible for any actions taken by NK.


7 posted on 08/11/2017 7:37:22 AM PDT by JPJones (There is no Law but Constitutional Law, and America is Its Agent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

The Chinese statement was not completely clear. What will they consider a first move? They don’t want pro western regime change, but they can’t really “stop” bombers and cruise missiles at least not initially.


8 posted on 08/11/2017 7:37:57 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

In the mean time “Fat Boy” gets to talk as much smack as he wants while he hides behind his momma.


9 posted on 08/11/2017 7:38:50 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Wink, wink.


10 posted on 08/11/2017 7:40:48 AM PDT by FES0844 (G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Move some nukes into South Korea and see if China gets serious about this destabilization of the region.


11 posted on 08/11/2017 7:40:56 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

A sane regime in North Korea would immediately start trying to tie itself economically into the Korean Miracle to its south. China dose not want a rational government in North Korea, even one nominally allied with China and a rational government in Norkea allied with China would be only nominally so or it would not be a rational government. A prospering and thus pro Western North Korea is as bad for Chinese sensibilities as a unified Korea formally allied with the USA.


12 posted on 08/11/2017 7:47:03 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy; All

John Bolton agrees with the WaPo take on this matter (just heard on Varney & Co on Fox Business).


13 posted on 08/11/2017 7:48:55 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

It may be too late.
NK has brainwashed three generations of their citizens.

They’d be lost in a SK free market society.


14 posted on 08/11/2017 7:49:11 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The solution is to replicate the Austrian State Treaty in Korea.

China will not give up Kim without something of value in exchange. Fighting them both is a terrible idea.


15 posted on 08/11/2017 7:57:00 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

China just wants our troops gone from the peninsula. If the Norks are taken out, I’ll make that deal.


16 posted on 08/11/2017 7:58:33 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

If they have been brain washed to well then he wouldn’t need the extreme security measures to ensure compliance that he has.

Many in NORK yearn to be free.


17 posted on 08/11/2017 7:59:14 AM PDT by CodeToad (AA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

(RIDICULE!!!) “WHAT??!!?? Fat-un Can do NO WRONG! (/RIDICULE
)


18 posted on 08/11/2017 7:59:29 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.king seal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“If the Norks are taken out, I’ll make that deal”

In a heartbeat. Unified, neutral Korea, no foreign troops or bases, Hyundai, Samsung, and LG pick up the costs associated with rescuing the people of DPRK and rebuilding there.


19 posted on 08/11/2017 8:11:15 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Any NK who supports Kim get a meal ration.
They like things the way they are just fine.


20 posted on 08/11/2017 8:13:44 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson