So you doubt the veracity of the forensic experts in the story? I do not know anything about the speed. I thought the case they presented coordinates with what has been reported here and the fact a progressive magazine printed the story at all was interesting.
He’s probably confusing something. I am not aware of any internet providers that can provide that speed, especially not “decades ago.”
doubt yes.
Veracity, no, not necessarily.
TBH I skimmed and gleaned. I’m not trying to throw water on this, but just the technical conclusions I saw getting jumped to in various spots were far closer to opinion than they were to facts.
But also, not only did I skim, I did not click the link and read the rest. I’m just saying... it casts a LOT of doubt. But that’s what it seems to do at best. So if you ask if I doubt, then yes, it’s easy to doubt doubt
Seth Rich apparently was a Berner who was deeply angered by how the Witch and DWS were stealing the nomination. He reacted by leaking the subject emails, something that dovetails with the transfer rates noted in this article. Thus, by ascribing the revelations to a leak, this article advances the case that Rich was assassinated in retaliation for leaking the emails. That, in turn, advances the Berners' cause for discrediting the Witch and DNC.
Remember, the left can be as internally vicious as it is externally vicious, as the Bolsheviks were in their liquidation of the Menshiviks.
“So you doubt the veracity of the forensic experts in the story?”
There is zero, actual - verifiable - facts listed in this progressive-linked “article.” The author doesn’t even know bits from bytes? C’mon.
I would like for it to be true, but that is irrelevant.
Critical thinking has died.