My reference wasn't to posting the article.
It was to simply accepting what Gaffney says at face value.
He has an agenda. Everybody in Washington as an agenda. And it's worth pointing that out.
You know that people use articles as a starting point for attacks on whoever the target is.
Rather than address each poster, I thought of making a general statement and addressing it to the person who posted the article, assuming you might be more rational than people who just launch into attacks based on Gaffney's.
"You" doesn't always mean somebody is attacking you personally for what you did.
Sometimes it's a more general advisory about what the many "yous" out there might want to avoid doing.
Gaffney is being less than honest.
The NSA isn’t the top position at the National Security Council and doesn’t do the hiring and firing.
That power lies with the Executive Secretary & Chief of Staff which in this case is a retired 3 Star named Keith Kellogg.
The average reader won’t know this but Gaffney certainly does.
The fact that he joins the chorus claiming that McMaster fired somebody’s pets on the NSC staff is a red flag that Gaffney is up to no good because he knows the facts don’t support what he’s saying.
“Sometimes it’s a more general advisory about what the many “yous” out there might want to avoid doing. “
There you go again! THREATENING Freepers for posting articles from other web sites that are in the public domain.
I get you don’t like the article and thus you are attacking the messengers. How about try attacking the facts instead of the messenger?
NEWS FLASH... This is not the first negative article on Free Republic about McMaster.