From the article, it would appear that she DID do the research and did what was required and still ran afoul of their burdensome “requirements”.
What part of “shall not be infringed” is complicated for you?
No - she researched how to properly transport a gun on a plane NOT the (pretty well known) New York anti-gun laws. That’s why she got nailed on her way back home when she tried to check in the guns in NY. And I agree the NY laws are wrong and unconstitutional but I’m not dumb enough to risk going to jail before the courts straighten things out. You are welcome to though.
I agree with you and moreover, the guarantee of a republican form of government should in and of itself be enough to make the US Constitution a MINIMUM standard of recognition for God-given liberties. That’s not enough for your average attorney, for whom the US Constitution was never intended to be understood or interpreted by a layman. We need the SCOTUS to somehow define our liberties for us?? This is why Congress needs to pass universal reciprocity, with federal remedies for violations by public officials. I would love to see NYC forced to recognize Constitutional carry by a citizen of Arizona.