Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto
Since almost all states had direct election of senators by the time the 17th passed...

First time I've read of this. Can you suggest a good source for more info on how this worked since the Constitution specified selection by the state legislature? TIA...

35 posted on 08/09/2017 8:00:08 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bird45

Ask why the Lincoln-Douglas Debates were held across Illinois in 1858.

http://www.heritage.org/constitution/amendments/17/essays/178/popular-election-of-senators

...By 1912, Senators were already picked by direct election in twenty-nine of the forty-eight states...

...What happened is that the people in most of the states gradually turned to nonbinding primary elections to select their Senator; state legislators promised to vote for the Senator that the people had selected in this “advisory” election...

[Another, Leftist, source actually details some of the problems]:

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/constitutional-myth-9-the-election-of-senators-harms-the-states/242225/

...Between 1890 and 1900, no fewer than fourteen Senate seats remained vacant because of legislative deadlock. In Oregon in 1897, the State House was so badly split over the Senate vacancy that it never convened at all...


37 posted on 08/09/2017 8:18:07 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson