Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DakotaGator

...from 13 federal agencies...
************************************
Obvious redundancy! Identifies where many more Federal “scientists” can be terminated from their jobs.

Apparently, the NYT doesn’t require their editors to ensure the reporters have done any independent research for facts.


18 posted on 08/07/2017 10:23:54 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: octex

written by gloBULL warming insiders...how convenient.
same old deceptive photo of smoking chimneys used to illustrate the piece.

another piece today, being picked up by plenty of FakeNews websites:

8 Aug: Guardian: US federal department is censoring use of term ‘climate change’, emails reveal
Exclusive: series of emails show staff at Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service advised to reference ‘weather extremes’ instead
by Oliver Milman in New York
“These records reveal Trump’s active censorship of science in the name of his political agenda,” said Meg Townsend, open government attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity...

The Center for Biological Diversity is currently suing several government agencies, including the EPA and state department, to force them to release information on the “censoring” of climate change verbiage...
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/07/usda-climate-change-language-censorship-emails

HuffPo’s headline has the denial, but then carries on as if it were probably true!

8 Aug: HuffPo: USDA Says They Never Told Staff To Use ‘Weather Extremes’ Instead Of ‘Climate Change’
But email correspondence just after the inauguration indicates otherwise.
by Jenna Amatulli
“The Natural Resources Conservation Service has not received direction from USDA or the Administration to modify its communications on climate change or any other topic,” Kaveh Sadeghzadeh, NRCS’s communications director, said in an email to HuffPost...

Sadeghzadeh told HuffPost that “these emails, sent in the first days of the new Administration, did not reflect the direction of senior agency leadership.”...
The NRCS’ site section on climate change has remained unchanged...

A change in verbiage would follow suit with other moves made by government agencies during Trump’s administration regarding climate change...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/usda-says-they-never-told-staff-to-use-weather-extremes-instead-of-climate-change_us_5988a35be4b0ca8b1d49fbee

of course, all government agencies should stop using the fake term “climate change” when they are supposedly talking about anthropological global warming.

there is no group more dishonest than the manmade global warming crowd.


21 posted on 08/07/2017 10:37:48 PM PDT by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: octex
Indeed. These “scientist” are advocating outside the terms of their employment. That is easily corrected.

Hope they can spell “McDonalds”.

49 posted on 08/08/2017 6:45:25 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson