Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The MiG-23: Russia's Worst Fighter Jet Ever?
The National Interest ^ | August 7, 2017 | Michael Peck

Posted on 08/07/2017 8:08:55 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2017 8:08:56 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I’d say the Lockheed F-104.


2 posted on 08/07/2017 8:15:11 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Also, the swing wing was not like an F-14 which could move and change automatically along with the conditions of the fight. The 23 pilot had to manually select the wing configuration.


3 posted on 08/07/2017 8:24:24 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
What could one expect from an aircraft that NATO gave the sadomasochistic name of Flogger?

And there's the MiG-15 Faggot.

4 posted on 08/07/2017 8:58:01 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

[mass formations of MiG-23s would use their superb acceleration to zoom in, launch their air-to-air missiles and zoom away]

Some say the Viet Cong were so protective of the Mig-21’s they used the same tactics.


5 posted on 08/07/2017 9:05:15 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
Some say the Viet Cong were so protective of the Mig-21’s they used the same tactics.

Not the viet cong. It was the North Vietnamese AF. The rest is true. They used slash and dash tactics to keep their fleet intact. Robin Olds messed up that tactic with Operation Bolo.

6 posted on 08/07/2017 9:40:10 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Yeah, I kinda lumped them all together. I probably should have included their Russian mercenaries.

Some reports showed the same apparently against the IAF — they’d be in some dogfight and the MiG-21’s would come in, fire off Atoll’s and keep right on going.

I’ll have to go back to see what battle(s) it was.


7 posted on 08/07/2017 9:43:07 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pfflier; Doogle

Oops didn’t see that last part.

I was about to mention Robin Olds.


8 posted on 08/07/2017 9:44:29 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
Whatever the Starfighter lacked in capability as an air-superiority fighter, it made up for in appearance. Which was 180 degrees from the homely Flogger.

I think the interceptor role of the 104 was well proven by the Japanese Air Self-Defense Force, which used the aircraft to counter intrusive Soviet aircraft from the '60s until the '80s.

9 posted on 08/07/2017 9:59:28 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

The F-104 wasn’t really a fighter, but rather an interceptor. It was designed to go very fast in a straight line, thus the stubby wings, among other design choices.


10 posted on 08/07/2017 10:07:01 PM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I got to look over the one they had in the TS “museum” at Nellis. It was the full-blown monkey version, all the markings were in English and German and the hard points were reversible. Rotate one way for Warsaw pact munitions, the other way for NATO.

The story they told us was that the early MiG-23 prototypes were experiencing engine shock stalls at transonic speeds so they decided to copy the intake ramp from the F-4 Phantom II. When the west finally got their hands on one, they also discovered there’s a wire cutter in the narrow gap between the engine nacelle and the fuselage. They put one there on the F-4 so if you use the crash barricade, the wire cutter keeps the net from pinning the canopy closed. Except the Soviets didn’t have any aircraft carriers so there was never any intent of operating them from carriers or potentially having to use a crash barrier.

Their explanation was that the Soviet engineers probably didn’t recognize the wire cutter for what it was but figured if M-D had taken the pains to add it to the F-4, it must have had some material benefit, so they’d better put them on the MiG as well.

Dunno if that was true or just a Cold War joke at the Rooskies expense, but we all got a chuckle from it.


11 posted on 08/07/2017 10:20:53 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

BIG TIME...(bolo)


12 posted on 08/07/2017 10:26:16 PM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..enever store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

I agree. It was to put missiles onto Soviet bombers.

Plus, one of them caught up with the NCC-1701 Enterprise.

Too bad about that tractor beam.


13 posted on 08/07/2017 10:40:14 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A friend of mine owns not just one but twelve Mig 23’s, he bought them in Poland, had them shipped to Borger, Tx and brought mechanics from Poland to assemble six of them. There they have sat for years. He had a wild idea how to use them but it never worked out.

So if anyone wants a Mig-23 I can hook you up.


14 posted on 08/08/2017 2:26:56 AM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Um ... F-111 (Aardvark) from ye olde days of Robert “Whiz Kid” McNamara. So called “variable” sweep-wing.


15 posted on 08/08/2017 3:27:37 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I saw first hand what the F-104 could do at NAS Jax. One had landed from Patrick AFB, ahead of a hurricane evacuation. The pilot rolled halfway out the hangar, hit his afterburner and went straight up. It was out of sight in 5 seconds!


16 posted on 08/08/2017 4:02:20 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paal Gulli

That’s great...never heard about that. Reminded me of the job they did in replicating a B-29 that had been interned in WWII. “Down to the last bolt...” they say...:)


17 posted on 08/08/2017 4:47:15 AM PDT by rlmorel (Those who sit on the picket fence are impaled by it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jamaksin

The F-111 turned out to be a very capable platform, and many pilots loved it...not the worst fighter ever (as a proxy for saying it was a piece of crap airframe)

I spoke to an Aussie at Oshkosh on year, and he raved about the plane, of which they had a bunch.

It just wasn’t a good air superiority fighter, but it was a fine platform.


18 posted on 08/08/2017 4:50:24 AM PDT by rlmorel (Those who sit on the picket fence are impaled by it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

IIRC the F-104 was the first plane to break the sound barrier flying straight up.


19 posted on 08/08/2017 6:07:40 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
It was a good Electronic warfare (AQ) platform...maybe not as good a Jammer as the EA-6B
Prowler, but serviceable.
20 posted on 08/08/2017 6:58:53 AM PDT by major_gaff (University of Parris Island, Class of '84)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson