“No, unlike you, President Nixon was a statesman and gentleman.”
Please, you mean, “loser”. There is nothing honorable or noble is caving to political pressures by communists.
If he was truly guilty of crimes then he wasn’t a statesman or gentleman in the first place.
Nixon was the first hint that there isn’t a two party system in DC. There is only the DC establishment against the rest of us.
Nixon’s own party threw him out along with the Democrats.
When fighting against an enemy, If you are the only one being honest and fair, you will lose the war.
Sessions did the legal and honorable thing when he recused himself.... and it set up the path for the illegal investigation that followed. obama’s AG’s NEVER recused themselves from anything.. and mueller is not recusing himself either.. they all should have.. but they don’t do the legal and honorable thing in their wars... they fight ugly and we have to learn it is that way ... adjust accordingly!!!
“If he was truly guilty of crimes then he wasn’t a statesman or gentleman in the first place.”
Whenever Watergate is brought up, people of good faith should immediately come back with the facts.
Both the Stupid and the Evil parties wine and dine moneyed citizens as part of their efforts to obtain donations. They try to get the citizen’s head spinning by inviting him to any event that will put him in the company of the famous and powerful.
At that particular time, in the run-up to the 1972 election, the demonrats had expanded this itinerary to include treating potential donors to the services of prostitutes, paid for out of DNC money—you know, Joe Sixpack’s ten bucks that he contributed to have a voice in our representative republic.
That was a felony. Actually, each instance was a separate felony.
Some of Nixon’s subordinates, without his knowledge, decided to try and obtain documentary proof of this, with the intention of exposing the demonrats’ felonious behavior. Unfortunately for America, for the people of South Viet Nam, and for mankind in general, they were not practiced and proficient criminals. As one might have guessed, they made a hash of it.
Nixon’s subordinates, then, were guilty of conspiracy to expose multiple felonies involving the improper use of DNC funds to pay prostitutes.
When his subordinates finally told him the truth, Nixon decided it would be best to cover up this trifling indiscretion. This was entirely reasonable, in view of the heinous crimes that the media had covered up for Roosevelt, maybe Truman, certainly Kennedy, and even Johnson. (Later, they even covered up murder for a sitting president.)
The demonrats, knowing that they had the media in their pocket, decided to lie, lie, lie, and spin, spin, spin, and artificially escalated this tempest in a teapot to the status of a (barf alert) “constitutional crisis.”
They had a few reasons for knifing Nixon.
1. Nixon had been involved in the effort to root foreign agents of influence out of the State Department and other government posts, which was an unforgivable sin against the Evil One.
2. The huge cloud of dust they raised with their hysterical blather about Nixon’s “crimes” completely obscured the reason for the break in: multiple demonrat felonies, involving a vice that most of America still found repugnant.
3. Nixon’s Vietnamization program had succeeded, and he was on the brink of Peace with Honor in Viet Nam. That would have been a ghastly defeat for the left.