[i_robot73]

>
What will it be when they have to start paying for everything that the government provides them today???
>

IMO, I see no wrong here; didn’t Texas state ~same? I’m also not of the mind that Statehood = can’t back out...no contract is forever.

1) I seem to recall they PAY more than get back, so PRO for them.
2) GOVT provides *SQUAT*. It is the property theft of taxpayers govt uses to placate the masses (this is the biggest hurtle vs. the Left: Not only staying on message, but FRAMING it correctly as well).

Though, even if they DID ‘leave’ I don’t see a future where the # idiot stickers/product changes would disappear, they still would be a huge economic engine to placate.

[arrogantsob]

There is no constitutional means of leaving the Union. That was the whole point of creating “...more perfect union.”

A convention of the states would be constitutional or an amendment.