Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone
Though I wouldn’t mind San Fran and Lost Angeles to leave we’ve already had this conversation from 1861-1865.

The legality of secession was not seriously debated. What happened was the side with the most people and guns subjugated the other people who wanted out.

27 posted on 07/31/2017 3:16:24 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

“The legality of secession was not seriously debated. What happened was the side with the most people and guns subjugated the other people who wanted out.”

That’s a fact. The federal government did not want to lose the revenues it was collecting from the Southern states. In 1861 the LAST thing the federal government wanted was to lose the lucrative element of the Southern states, with their agricultural engine and their four-season ports. It still had California, but it was too far away, still relatively undeveloped, and the Panama Canal was still forty years in the future). The fact is that in 1861 the federal government needed the Southern states far more than the Southern states needed the federal government.


40 posted on 07/31/2017 3:39:49 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson