Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Already posted here with a different headline. Interestingly enough, both links still head to the respective headlines.

The U.S. Navy’s Stealthy Zumwalt Class Destoyer: America’s New ‘Pocket’ Battleships?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3573255/posts

Ah.I see the problem. You didn’t link to the named source, but rather to someone’s blog “scout.com military warrior”

With appropriate comments on the author’s “Iowa class destroyers”

The writer proves he’s an idiot at either link - or the various editors are trying successfully to make him look like one.


4 posted on 07/30/2017 7:45:42 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

Oops, will ask for it to be pulled down.


6 posted on 07/30/2017 7:49:26 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35
The "Littoral Combat Ship" has been a dud since its conception. The LCS was supposedly meant to provide close-in fire support for amphibious forces (to make it so destroyers and cruisers wouldn't have large guns in the future - the navy never liked the gunfire support mission).

Instead, they have proposed but never added the half-baked fire support weapons that never survived the testing process.

I asked my buds at Dahlgren what the LCS was designed to do and they said "to sink in shallow water".

23 posted on 07/31/2017 3:41:17 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson