Replies

It would be unwise to fire Session since it would further the Democrat’s false narrative of Trump interfering in an investigation (an investigation which itself is a false narrative) and would give them their lusted after “Saturday night massacre”. Firing Sessions would be a dream come true for Democrats.

So you think Trump shouldn't have fired Comey?

If Sessions is not willing to take on the Deep State corruption, then Trump should fire him. It would "further" the goals of the Deep State if he didn't.

Comey has a long history of very questionable actions, if not outright complicity. Sessions has been AG for a few months.

The pressure to fire Sessions is due to 1) the Special Counsel, and 2) no apparent action regarding leaks, unmasking, Clinton Foundation, Clinton e-mail, Uranium One, etc.

First dispose of the Special Counsel. The way out is spelled out in the article linked in post 24:

Explicitly and unambiguously, Director Comey described a counterintelligence investigation, not a criminal investigation.
Direct Sessions to consider whether his recusal complies with the regulation that limits disqualification to criminal investigations as to which there is a conflict.
Direct Rosenstein to consider whether his appointment of a special counsel complies with the regulations that limit such appointments to criminal investigations and to specify exactly what potential crimes the special counsel is authorized to investigate.
If this were done, if the regulations were followed, all of us, including the president, would know what crimes the president is suspected of committing . . . if there are any.

The special counsel will disappear. And importantly, it's disappearance does not feed the Democrat's false narratives.

Next we'll see if there is any action on these other issues. If months go by with nothing visible - no subpoenas, no charges, etc - then fire him.

I think Sessions needs to get his priorities straight and pick up the pace, but firing him at this point in time would be a mistake.