Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

Your thinking in these matters is, IMO, flawless!

I have absolutely no problem with women or trans people serving...just not in certain roles.

The military is, as Rush says, “To kill people and break things” Anything that makes them less effective in that role is to be AVOIDED!


19 posted on 07/27/2017 8:06:15 PM PDT by Bobalu ( Healthcare - someone must pay. Who should it be, and how did they get that obligation?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Bobalu
I have absolutely no problem with women or trans people serving...just not in certain roles.

Women and trans people, if they want to serve, should serve as non-military civilian employees.

Military training is expensive. The purpose of giving it to all recruits is so that, when it hits the fan, those military people doing clerical, supply, etc jobs in the rear, can be moved to the front to fight. If you staff those jobs with people who CANNOT be reassigned to combat, then you LOSE that reserve capacity which might be critical to winning the fight.

42 posted on 07/28/2017 5:03:52 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bobalu
I have absolutely no problem with women or trans people serving...just not in certain roles.

Stupid post of the day.

46 posted on 07/28/2017 5:46:26 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson