It was obvious during hearing’s where things were going.
Hearings before November? Trump expressed anger that Sessions didn't apprise of recusal from "whatever," before Sessions was selected.
I'm open to being corrected, but I've searched the Sessions confirmation hearings transcripts (that's a link to my summary of day one, January 10), the day when he did not appear on his own behalf, Comey hearings, and a few other hearings.
There were news reports of Russia interfering in the election before the election. That's a far cry from accusing the Trump campaign of a crime.
If Trump wanted a recusal-proof AG, he'd have as much luck at that, as he would finding a lawsuit-proof contract or property.
Anyway, you made a specific claim. Which hearing or hearings are you referring to? I'll study them for references to a case against the Trump campaign as well as references to recusal. Or you can back up your own claim that "it (a need for Sessions to recuse) was obvious during hearing's"