Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

He knew Russia was an issue and he knew he was going to oversee the investigation. Of course he knew or should have known. Negligent.


21 posted on 07/22/2017 4:02:28 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa
-- He knew Russia was an issue and he knew he was going to oversee the investigation. Of course he knew or should have known. --

The evidence does not support your conclusion. Yes, he knew that Mook and others had "blamed Russia" and "accused Trump of egging the Russians on to steal Hillary's email," but neither of them foresaw what is being sold as a criminal investigation against the Trump campaign, for coordinating Russian activities to the benefit of the Trump campaign.

Within the past few days I've read the contemporaneous material around the time of announcement (November), confirmation hearings (January), and at that point in time, NOBODY was making noises that the campaign was going to be accused of that criminal act. Durbin raised the possibility as a hypothetical in January.

By your standard, YOU TOO should have known, in November, that a Special Counsel was going to be appointed to oversee an investigation into Trump campaign dealing with Russia. was that on your mid the week after the election?

26 posted on 07/22/2017 4:15:13 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson