Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Architect of Paradise

I am not sure how I feel about this law. I am definitely pro-life, but I can imagine circumstances where the father is nothing more than a sperm donor.

I’d agree with it, I suppose, if the father were legally obligated to take care of the little one, pay for clothing, school, food, etc. Perhaps even get up at night when the baby cries?

Oh, I just realized...I am advocating marriage. How old-fashioned of me! /s

Women gave up a lot during the “sexual revolution.”


6 posted on 07/18/2017 1:26:54 AM PDT by proud American in Canada ( God Bless America (Trump: I will bear the slings and arrows for you, the American people))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proud American in Canada

You could impugn the character of the mother just as easily as you do the father if you wanted to.

The fact is that fathers are fathers from conception forward just as mothers are mothers from conception forward.

Neither should be preemptively demeaned on the basis of stereotypes much less stripped of the legal right to protect their children’s lives between conception and birth.


19 posted on 07/18/2017 3:55:44 AM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: proud American in Canada

Women gave up a lot during the “sexual revolution.”
_______________________________________________________

They gave up the beauty of womanhood, motherhood, and helpmeet.


23 posted on 07/18/2017 4:10:03 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson