I raise this issue not because I am for choice but rather to consider all the issues involved in any such legislation.
The math is simple.
When both parents have a legal right to protect their daughters and sons between conception and birth, neither can demand it over the objection of the other, since it takes the consent of both.
In contrast, when the woman is empowered to unilaterally kill the baby between conception and birth, the imposition of obligations on the father becomes an illogical incongruity.