One image that a lot of experts see in these stories is a possible violation of the federal law banning foreign contributions to federal campaigns ironically the very claim that the meeting was called to discuss with regard to Hillary Clinton. The relevant law is 36 U.S.C. 510, which bars direct or indirect contributions or other things of value from a foreign national. MSNBC justice and security analyst Matthew Miller said Trump Jr. could now go to jail because it doesnt have to be money it can be, potentially, accepting information. So hes potentially confessing in his statement to committing a crime.Of course, the crux is other thing of value. Under this approach, a court would have to include information as a thing of value like money and then declare that Trump Jr. solicited the information by agreeing to go to the meeting. If that were the case, the wide array of meetings by politicians and their aides with foreign nationals would suddenly become possible criminal violations.
It is common for foreign governments to withhold or take actions to influence elections in other countries. Information is often shared through various channels during elections from lobbyists, non-government organizations, and government officials. This includes former Clinton aide Alexandra Chalupa, who allegedly worked with Ukrainian government officials and journalists to come up with dirt on Trump and Manafort.
Consider the implications of such an unprecedented extension of the criminal code. The sharing of information even possible criminal conduct by a leading political figure would be treated the same as accepting cash. It would constitute a major threat to free speech, the free press and the right of association. It would also expose a broad spectrum of political speech to possible criminal prosecution.
Executive branch officials could then investigate campaigns on any meetings where information or tips might have originated from a foreign source. Such an expansion would likely hit challengers the hardest, since sitting presidents not only control the Justice Department, but the government has a myriad of back channels in communicating with foreign officials.
While those contacts could be dismissed as official communications, a challenger could be viewed as consorting with foreigners. Under this interpretation, the act of a foreign non-government organization or foreign academic feeding an American damaging information on Trumps foreign investments or business activities could be viewed as a federal crime.
Wouldn’t the Trump dossier which was put together by a foreign national be illegal???
The relevant law is 36 U.S.C. 510, which bars direct or indirect contributions or other things of value from a foreign national.
Didn't Bill Clinton gets a whole bunch of donations from the Chinese when he was in office?
Yes. Thank Gd our first family are amateurs. How refreshing that an honest businessman like Don Jr wasn’t slimy enough to know to send a surrogate! He is forgiven! He had no idea just how corrupt the world of politics is. Even the President is stunned and he was no neophyte.