This article and reporting in this case is a primer for fake news.
This article contradicts itself all over the place.
First it says: “coffee farmer in Hawaii who appealed his deportation order in federal court was forced to leave the island late Friday”
Then it says: “Ortiz voluntarily left Hawaii to return to Mexico”
It says: “The 43-year-old was smuggled in to the U.S. when he was 15 in order to join his mother.”
Then it says: “Ortiz had been working to obtain legal citizenship in the United States for nearly three decades”
Well, he came here as a 15 year old three decades ago. Are they saying this 15 year immediately began “working to obtain legal citizenship”?
None of it makes sense except as an appeal to emotion.
And this article doesn’t say that it was the Obama administration that first issued the deportation order.
And it doesn’t say why he is subject to this - TWO DUI convictions.
Well, that’s useful information.
Where’d you get it?
These articles either bury facts or is devoid of pertinent
Maybe they were 'well-respected' DUI convictions.
I know a 'well-respected' IT systems administrator who overstayed his visa once and now is unable to come back to the US from the UK.
Too bad his immigration lawyer didn't know about the 'well-respected' exception to the law, huh...