Posted on 07/09/2017 8:32:19 PM PDT by bobsunshine
We previously wrote how the State of Hawaii (with co-plaintiff Dr. Ismail Elshikh) struck out in Hawaii federal court and in the 9th Circuit, in seeking clarification of how Trumps Travel Order No. 2 was to be implemented in light of the prior court injunctions and the Supreme Courts substantial overruling of those injunctions:
Judge Denies Hawaii request to halt Trump admin interpretation of SCOTUS Travel Order ruling 9th Circuit DENIES Hawaii request for Emergency Injunction over Trump Travel Order.
The key problem identified by the court was the Hawaiis request for clarification was not proper. The District Court ruled that if Hawaii wanted clarification of a Supreme Court Order, it should seek such clarification from the Supreme Court.....
And sure enough, Hawaii late Friday night filed a new request, a Motion to Enforce or Alternatively Modify (pdf.) the District Courts prior injunction, and a supporting Declaration (pdf.). Full copies of each are embedded at the bottom of this post. The Court entered an Order on the docket:
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce or, In the Alternative, to Modify Preliminary Injunction. Dkt. No. 328. Defendants shall file their opposition by Tuesday, July 11, 2017.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Desperate DemocRATS do desperate things....those votes are a life and death matter for them....I wonder if these RATS realize who pays the VAST majority of the Hawaii state TOURIST revenues?? Think it is DemocRATS????
Hawaii, the birthplace of oboma but not really. Obongo-Jangles
This is at Obama’s behest.
Why can’t our side fight for freedom with the same determination the left fights for our destruction. I think we need new leaders in both houses of congress.
Courts don’t give ‘advisory opinions’. Sounds like political lawyers like Obamagumbe are driving now.
They’ll get slapped down for contempt of court and wasting its time. HI was told if it had a problem with the SCOTUS order, to take it up with the SCOTUS.
“The State of Hawaii”
Sounds quite grand - but in this case it simply means another leftist abusing his public office, not some sort of unanimous public consensus.
It is the action of an out of control extremist. Sober adults should bring him back under control.
PS I guess the ‘case or controversy’ requirement in the US Constitution wasn’t in Barry’s course materials.
Thank goodness all those Taxpayer funded State Attorneys in HI have nothing better to do with their time.
You know, like Prosecuting Criminals.
I know some Peurto Ricans who would love to reassign the Island State title.
“Why cant our side fight for freedom with the same determination the left fights for our destruction.”
If they’re not fighting for us, freedom, and the United States, then regardless of whatever motions they’re going through or whatever bs is spewing out from their cake hole, they are NOT on “our side”.
How about your own showy but ineffectual cake hole spewing? Maybe even you aren’t on your “own side.”
Hawaii has got to go.
Stuck on stupid.
PR needs to be rejoined with the Hispanics of Spain.
Must be slower shave ice sales across the islands.
Didn’t help they just lost half the cast of Hawaii Five-0.
I wonder if the new actors will be muslim.....
Man, when you’re 100% on the Left and the Ninth Circuit tells you to get stuffed that’s a big hint you’re barking up the wrong tree.
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in play. Nothing more, nothing less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.