[StAnDeliver]

"Actually, Occam's Razor would favor the simplest hypothesis that fits all the facts: in this case, it would favor an internal leak rather than a Russian hack as the source of Wikileaks' information, unless there is evidence that does not fit this theory."

Actually, that's exactly what I said. Rich may not have been the primary source within the DNC, but was the one left holding the bag. This is contextually driven by Henkster's observation that, paraphrasing, all things are possible. Thus my cite to Occam's Razor.

[Fedora]

But that’s postulating two sources when one will do, which is not an application of Occam’s Razor.