To: cdcdawg
Just because Seth Rich downloaded the emails to a USB drive doesn’t mean that the Russians didn’t also hack into the DNC server. And just because the Russians hacked into the DNC server doesn’t mean Seth Rich didn’t also download the emails to a USB device. The point is that it was the content of those emails, revealing the corruption of the DNC, that damaged Clinton’s campaign. Neither Seth Rich nor the Russians wrote those emails.
29 posted on
07/09/2017 3:29:12 PM PDT by
henkster
(Ask your favorite liberal to take the "Snowflake Challenge.")
To: henkster
44 posted on
07/09/2017 3:51:39 PM PDT by
Pagey
(8 years of MISERY, Thanks to Valerie Jarrett. Wretched human.)
To: henkster
And just because the Russians hacked into the DNC server doesn’t mean Seth Rich didn’t also download the emails to a USB device. That sounds right, except the "Russians" were the DNC.
48 posted on
07/09/2017 4:03:55 PM PDT by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: henkster
"Just because Seth Rich downloaded the emails to a USB drive doesn’t mean that the Russians didn’t also hack into the DNC server. And just because the Russians hacked into the DNC server doesn’t mean Seth Rich didn’t also download the emails to a USB device." Exactly. Rich may not have been the primary source, but could have been left holding the bag. Occam's Razor.
"The point is that it was the content of those emails, revealing the corruption of the DNC, that damaged Clinton’s campaign. Neither Seth Rich nor the Russians wrote those emails."
So true.
83 posted on
07/10/2017 12:40:07 AM PDT by
StAnDeliver
(Prosecute the win. Run up the score.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson