When it’s someone else’s life, we ask if the treatment is justified. If it is your life, do you want people debating the quality of your life before offering treatment? And, I don’t think that there is enough information in any news article to base a decision that can end someone’s life upon. All the Monday morning doctors with their superior thought processes make me sick.
Actually, debating the quality of life and the future treatment plan based on that is done on a daily basis in hospitals. What I am is consistent, unlike a lot of people here on this forum. A lot of you ( including me) are against Americans paying for illegal aliens medical care. Yet, on a British baby, you all want the American medical system to treat this baby with no assurances at all that the Gards will pay for the whole cost of treatment. The money they raised will be gone pretty quickly, and then what? The physician who is offering the treatment has stated it is not going to help. So why are the Gards pushing to bring the baby here? Because they know , once on American soil, they can have our medical system pay for his future care. This baby cannot move, has constant seizures, cannot eat or breathe, is blind.
The best scenario that could happen is the Vatican hospital can accept this baby, and pay heir money out for expenses and leave the USA out of this.