And why would they?
Are we to believe that if the DNC computer contained the slighted scintilla of evidence to support their 'RUSSIA RUSSIA" lies, they wouldn't have had it "above the fold" for months on end.
Or do we suspicion that they wouldn't 'let' the FBI see it - and the FBI did nothing TO see it - because there is no "RUSSIA RUSSIA" - but that something leads to 'Seth"?
It’s not so much the DNC holding back the server, as that we’ve been fed a cock-and-bull story for months that the US intelligence agencies investigated the hack, when it was an absolute lie now that we know they’ve never even looked at the server.
Same MO as the Benghazi lie. Conscious, intentional lying.