None of your answers were founded in reality.
What does this mean?
I gave an answer to questions w/o engaging in constant ad hominem. Ergo, your tactics (strategy?) and conclusions are suspect.
Anyone who cannot defend their ideas w/o resulting to mere vitriol has a weak argument.
I offer a final bit of engagement: you go ahead and give your final salvo of invective. Your child like need to “get the last word” is apparent. I will not respond, and you can carry on believing that you really “got the best of that exchange”.