An armed combatant and an unarmed non combatant have different definitions do they not? Did I not say unarmed? Did I ever even remotely write a pass for the evil Islam brings to this world or suggest it is good? How can you confuse what I am saying? How can you not understand that?
How can you misunderstand that killing unarmed women and children just because an isis nut lives in the same city or because they are enslaved is wrong? Wtf is wrong with you guys. Have you all become so bloodthirsty? How is that any better than Islam? We didn’t round up hitler youth and kill them just because and we didn’t bomb German children deliberately. Collateral damage happens. Some were suggesting deliberate targeting.
Or maybe in your happy little universe we would have surrendered rather than harm eine lockigen Haar of a Nazi baby.
Of course Japan would have made a Nanking of the west coast, and Germany a Poland of the east, but at least your conscience would be clear...
http://biblehub.com/1_samuel/15-3.htm
2”Thus says the LORD of hosts, ‘I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he set himself against him on the way while he was coming up from Egypt. 3Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.’”