Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww

Their prerogative, not a court’s.


27 posted on 06/29/2017 9:18:28 PM PDT by Marchmain (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Marchmain

I would agree in some cases, however in this case I cannot. From all I’ve seen on this case... the hospital, many physicians and the courts are trying very hard to ease this prolonged suffering of the child. It should not have come to this point.

There are good reasons why the parents were not allowed to take the child home as they hoped. There is far more relating to his health the parents are not, and have not in the past made known in their quest to sustain his body.


38 posted on 06/30/2017 7:13:40 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Marchmain

Having seen the court and physicians reports...including the US Dr. who now says he did not realize the severity of his illness and condition......and that his treatment was unlikely to help..... even moreso the parents agreeing that his life as it is should not be sustained.....it’s pretty obvious the child needs to be let go.

I don’t know how the parents have stood 7 to 8 hours of their child having seizures.....which are severe and certainly indicate the vast brain damage. Let alone all the other ills...fro resperatory etc.

He is terminal regardless of efforts.....sadly so.


40 posted on 06/30/2017 9:19:58 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson