Cutting us down to 50 to 55 editors from more than 100, and expecting the same level of quality in the report, is dumbfoundingly unrealistic, the letter reads.
Yikes, they call this quality?! Can you imagine what’s to come?
If they did their jobs instead of practicing a failed ideology they may have been a decent paper. If I was the owner of the Times, I would change the focus of the paper to the crossword puzzle and coupons and shut the rest of it down. Sell the building and move operations out to a small store out of a strip mall in Jersey.
Now we know. How many editors does it take to make toilet paper?? 100.