[arthurus]

In its most basic biological sense women marry men for protection and sustenance.Pajama Boy is not going to fight off any tigers or housebreakers or mice and he is not going to provide much for a woman and her children from his parents’ back bedroom. If she and he are faced with a robbery on the street he would be expected to faint or be the first to run away and leave wife to the mugger. I know it is official- it is doctrine that all differences between men and women, physical and mental, are strictly social constructs and imaginary and need to be overcome. But human nature- DNA and the Hand of God- cannot be overcome.

[arthurus]

Didn’t that guy in the first picture up there just lose an election in Georgia?

[servo1969]

Reminds me of something Professor Jordan Peterson said during a question and answer session in March of this year:
(These aren't exact quotes.)
The current progressive attitude towards men is demonstrated in-
"the insistence that the highest moral virtue for a modern man is 'harmlessness.' Which is absurd. Women don't even like harmless men; they hate them! They like to claw them apart. What women really want are dangerous men who are civilized. And they want to help civilize them. That's Beauty and the Beast."

"No woman in her right mind wants a useless man. Unless... what she really wants is someone she can dominate and infantilize."

https://youtu.be/NNUcR-eMxaE?t=31s
(Starts out about the absurdity of cultural appropriation but quickly moves into what Peterson has learned throughout his career regarding what women say they want vs what they actually want.)

[wardaddy]

I think they actually do want pajama boys

They are intimidated by alpha men