Someone needs to volunteer to be the test case to go to the supreme court, as Scopes volunteered for the monkey trial in 1925.
The consequences here will be much more extreme, especially in the interim. But the right volunteer, with the right connections and the right financial backing should be able to do ok all the way to a supreme court vindication or a Trump pardon.
I would be hopeful for a Trump interaction here, but Trump has shown no signs of honoring his 2nd amendment promises.
“Someone needs to volunteer to be the test case to go to the supreme court, as Scopes volunteered for the monkey trial in 1925.”
The ACLU actively advertised for more than a year, Scopes answered the ad.
“... Someone needs to volunteer to be the test case to go to the supreme court ...”
I have thought about this myself with many of these issue we get beat up on.
Seems like this would be a good solution to many of our problems. The liberals do it all the time, seems to work wonders for them.
Where the hell are the NRA, GOA, etc. on this? It's their job to finance resistance to illegal gun laws, isn't it? (crickets)
The article says gun owners are stocking up on ammunition now before the restrictive law is effective. This is reminiscent of Americans stocking up on incandescent light bulbs before the effective date of the Boxer-supported law banning them and requiring CFL’s.
Why do I get the impression that all the democrat clowns in Sacramento are stocking up on ammunition company stocks in the same manner that I believe Barbara Boxer may have with CFL manufacturers? In my opinion, that is the main function of these bans, not to promote safety.