Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnk

You’re right...a little more intriguing everyday. Rush thinks the Russian story is fizzling because of the Washington Post story last week. I think that the testimony of Jeh Johnson and Comey that the DHS and FBI were prevented from looking at the DNC computers has a lot to do with it too. The story is starting to turn back on the democrats. Why were DHS and FBI prevented from investigating this foreign ‘hack’? That just doesn’t make sense. If there REALLY was a hack the DNC would be demanding an investigation, wouldn’t they? Unless there’s something even bigger that the DNC and other democrats are hiding.


3 posted on 06/26/2017 11:50:52 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pgkdan

As I posted in another thread in the Thread entitled “Trump Demands apology, accuses Obama of having colluded or obstructed:

The more information that becomes public, the More I begin to wonder about the Hacking of the DNC. We know now:

1) DNC was hacked and some 19,000 emails from January 2015 to May 2016 were released on Wikileaks, These emails were from 7 DNC members. However, the DNC has some 200 members. So one would think there are thousands of emails not hacked.

2) We know definitively that J. Johnson, Obama’s head of Homeland Security and FBI went to the DNC to review the DNC servers after they were hacked. They refused.

Question, why did they refuse? What was in those emails?

3) We know also know that Obama had information from CIA from well sourced agents in Russia that Putin directly ordered the Hack of the DNC (there goes the crazy leftwing narrative that Trump or RNC was involved with the Hack). Obama new it was Putin

4) We also know that Comey, FBI director at the time, now testified that AG Lynch directed him to call the Investigation of Hillary’s emails a “Matter” not “investigatin” and that she met with Bill Clinton at an airport hanger in Nevada.

Question: What if some of those other emails that were not hacked contain discussion between DNC and Lynch and suggest that there was collusion between Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch an the DNC to protect Hillary.

Comey testified that he saw some email evidence, maybe from the emails that he found from Weiner or Huma that Hillary let them see that suggested that the DNC and Lynch seem to be saying things that were essentially the same, suggesting some communication between the two.

5) Trump says Obama did nothing about Putin because they thought Hillary would win and all this stuff above would go away. In other words, none of this would have seen the light of day

6) Trump wins and now there is collusion between Trump and Putin mantra that the NYT, WPOST, CNN and MSNBC have been pushing since November.

7) If there was any “collusion”, my guess it was among Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton and the DNC to protest Hillary. If Obama new about this, and my guess is he did not unless Jim Comey had the guts to go over Lynch’s head to tell Obama directly, and I doubt he had the guts to do so, then he is potentially guilty. But I don’t think Comey, based on what I have seen, had the balls to go over Lynch’s head to report this to Obama (i.e. the Matter vs investigation directive from her to him).

Sorry if long,


8 posted on 06/26/2017 12:54:07 PM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson