Just on the face of it. How is a Russian attack a cause to confer with the legislative branch when the immediate security of the nation is in the hands of the executive?
A weak leader looking for an excuse.
Joshng Earnestly is living up to his name.
‘A weak leader looking for an excuse.’
This is the answer. The question was, “What was President Obama?”
==============================================
PAPER TRAIL EXAMPLE: the Obama admin announced on Oct. 7, 2016 that the theft and release of DNC emails was part of a widespread campaign “intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.”
Looking back, this Oct move by Obama was clearly intended to fend off his collusion w/ then-DNC head Debbie Wassermann Schultz, in the Pakistani spy network on Capitol Hill.
The buzz is the Pakistani Muslims were hired by Debbie Wasserman Schultz----she got them security clearances and humongous salaries and helped them abscond....
The more you examine the Paki/infiltration, the more you sense that D/W/S did not act alone on this......(that fact does not exonerate her treasonous activity).
This gal D/W/S is super-ambitious. She actually has a spreadsheet of those that "owed her" .......people she did favors for.
D/W/S was especially keen on getting into the good graces of the half-caste Royal Idiot b/c it suited her crass self-serving ambitions.
Strangely enough, on the surface it seemed like the half/caste kept shrugging her off.....as she pursued him w/ a vengeance.
Distilling the info, one concludes, she was a willing "doer of tasks," but he had to give the appearance that they were not connected.
The Pakis could not have (A) gotten security clearance, and, (B) could not have absconded without some pretty high-level help.
The grotesque salaries are also problematic.....could be one way she was paid off........campaign contributions, kickbacks, wire-transfers, and the like.