Posted on 06/25/2017 1:12:54 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
ADOT awarded the project to Connect 202 Partners in December 2015, but it was an unsolicited proposal in 2013 that pushed the agency to consider entering into a P3 for Loop 202. ADOT previously projected that, upon completion, the new highway would provide a $200 million economic benefit to the area by saving commuters 15 million hours of drive time every year.
This isn't the only P3 to be inspired by unexpected pitches from the private sector. In May, Kansas City, MO, construction firm Burns & McDonnell sent city officials a $1 billion proposal in which they offered to finance a new Kansas City International Airport terminal. Two weeks later, international engineering and construction giant AECOM sent the city a letter suggesting integrated project delivery was the way to build a new terminal and asked to be part of the process.
Soon after, Kansas City officials decided to move forward with a P3 for delivery of a new terminal and issued a request for proposals for a 750,000-square-foot, $1 billion terminal and parking garage. Bids for the project are due next week.
In February, Los Angeles County Metrorail officials also reported that they had received several unsolicited P3 proposals from teams including Skanska USA-Kiewit Infrastructure and Parsons Transportation Group-Cintra US Services that wanted to deliver two major transportation projects, the Sepulveda Pass Transit Corridor and the West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor.. The agency said using a P3 could help bring the projects on line 14 to 15 years earlier than planned.
Government agencies are increasingly using P3s to take on large transportation projects, typically those with lengthy operations and maintenance components. Organizations like the American Road & Transportation Builders Association say P3s will continue to play a role in future projects, and they will also be a key component of President Donald Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure plan.
However, not all P3 projects see such positive results. Earlier this month, Indiana Finance Authority officials said they want to take over a delayed and reportedly financially troubled highway project that is currently being constructed under a P3 structure. Completion of the Interstate 69 Section 5 project, which has been pushed back four times, is now set for August 2018.
Because of it's scope, and that the tree huggers wanted to stop it, the state stopped all permits until a I-5 interchange was built. They estimated 3 years and millions of dollars that were not in the WashDOT budget.
My employer said they would build it themselves. All that was asked was a simple interchange (on/ off ramps) as had been built countless times in America. Simple.
The state called them out saying there was no way it could be done so easily by a private contractor.
It was built in 6 or 7 months and way under the budget the state estimated.
Yes, indeed, private companies can finance roadwork. Wal-Mart recently contributed to a rebuild of an I-81 interchange in southern Virginia near one of their new stores.
Private companies have financed roadwork since the founding of our republic.
It’s no wonder it can be done cheaper and faster privately.
Any road work done for the government must follow the prevailing wage rate, Davis Bacon Act.
Here in Minneapolis a flagperson would get paid over 49 bucks per hour.
http://workplace.doli.state.mn.us/prevwage/commercial_data.php?county=27
President Trump should highlight this in one of his press briefings.
I have a friend in Santa Cruz that calls me every Sun. Today he told me Granite Construction vacated all of their properties and moved their location from Watsonville to Monterey. They put everything up for sale and now refuse to do business with anyone in Watsonville. They even bought their trucks, materials and equipment locally.
Why, you might ask? Because the Mexicans (the majority of the population of Watsonville Ca.) has been giving them a bad time for making a proposal to "build the wall".
It seems that is always the difference between private enterprise and government, big or small. Caliber of planners between the two, political interference, etc.?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.