Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Construction team to deliver AZ's first P3 highway 3 years early
ConstructionDIVE ^ | June 13, 2017 | Kim Slowey

Posted on 06/25/2017 1:12:54 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Dive Brief:

Dive Insight:

​ADOT awarded the project to Connect 202 Partners in December 2015, but it was an unsolicited proposal in 2013 that pushed the agency to consider entering into a P3 for Loop 202. ADOT previously projected that, upon completion, the new highway would provide a $200 million economic benefit to the area by saving commuters 15 million hours of drive time every year.

This isn't the only P3 to be inspired by unexpected pitches from the private sector. In May, Kansas City, MO, construction firm Burns & McDonnell sent city officials a $1 billion proposal in which they offered to finance a new Kansas City International Airport terminal. Two weeks later, international engineering and construction giant AECOM sent the city a letter suggesting integrated project delivery was the way to build a new terminal and asked to be part of the process.

Soon after, Kansas City officials decided to move forward with a P3 for delivery of a new terminal and issued a request for proposals for a 750,000-square-foot, $1 billion terminal and parking garage. Bids for the project are due next week.

In February, Los Angeles County Metrorail officials also reported that they had received several unsolicited P3 proposals from teams — including Skanska USA-Kiewit Infrastructure and Parsons Transportation Group-Cintra US Services — that wanted to deliver two major transportation projects, the Sepulveda Pass Transit Corridor and the West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor.. The agency said using a P3 could help bring the projects on line 14 to 15 years earlier than planned.

Government agencies are increasingly using P3s to take on large transportation projects, typically those with lengthy operations and maintenance components. Organizations like the American Road & Transportation Builders Association say P3s will continue to play a role in future projects, and they will also be a key component of President Donald Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure plan.

However, not all P3 projects see such positive results. Earlier this month, Indiana Finance Authority officials said they want to take over a delayed and reportedly financially troubled highway project that is currently being constructed under a P3 structure. Completion of the Interstate 69 Section 5 project, which has been pushed back four times, is now set for August 2018.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Indiana; US: Kansas; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: arizona; california; construction; indiana; infrastructure; loop202; missouri; p3; phoenix; ppp; transportation

1 posted on 06/25/2017 1:12:54 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
some years ago, my former employer developed land for mixed use in DuPont WA. It was a planned residential community with office parks

Because of it's scope, and that the tree huggers wanted to stop it, the state stopped all permits until a I-5 interchange was built. They estimated 3 years and millions of dollars that were not in the WashDOT budget.

My employer said they would build it themselves. All that was asked was a simple interchange (on/ off ramps) as had been built countless times in America. Simple.

The state called them out saying there was no way it could be done so easily by a private contractor.

It was built in 6 or 7 months and way under the budget the state estimated.

2 posted on 06/25/2017 2:05:01 PM PDT by llevrok (A group of baboons is called a "congress." Just sayin' .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Yes, indeed, private companies can finance roadwork. Wal-Mart recently contributed to a rebuild of an I-81 interchange in southern Virginia near one of their new stores.


3 posted on 06/25/2017 2:08:05 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (April 2006 Message from Dan http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Private companies have financed roadwork since the founding of our republic.


4 posted on 06/25/2017 2:17:07 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (It's not gun violence, it's thug violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

It’s no wonder it can be done cheaper and faster privately.

Any road work done for the government must follow the prevailing wage rate, Davis Bacon Act.

Here in Minneapolis a flagperson would get paid over 49 bucks per hour.

http://workplace.doli.state.mn.us/prevwage/commercial_data.php?county=27


5 posted on 06/25/2017 2:21:17 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

6 posted on 06/25/2017 2:26:42 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (It's not gun violence, it's thug violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

President Trump should highlight this in one of his press briefings.


7 posted on 06/25/2017 2:47:26 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Granite Construction was mentioned as one of the contractors.

I have a friend in Santa Cruz that calls me every Sun. Today he told me Granite Construction vacated all of their properties and moved their location from Watsonville to Monterey. They put everything up for sale and now refuse to do business with anyone in Watsonville. They even bought their trucks, materials and equipment locally.

Why, you might ask? Because the Mexicans (the majority of the population of Watsonville Ca.) has been giving them a bad time for making a proposal to "build the wall".

8 posted on 06/25/2017 4:01:00 PM PDT by lewislynn (So what did he say that got him in trouble with Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
. . . restructured the 22-mile project so that the last section could be built all at once instead of as nine separate projects as the state originally planned.

It seems that is always the difference between private enterprise and government, big or small. Caliber of planners between the two, political interference, etc.?

9 posted on 06/26/2017 10:19:39 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson